Understanding Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): What They Are and How They Shape Health

  • Home
  • |
  • Uncategorized
  • |
  • Understanding Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): What They Are and How They Shape Health
Adverse Childhood Experiences

Educational Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you believe adverse childhood experiences may be affecting your mental or physical health, please consult a qualified mental health professional for a comprehensive evaluation.

If you are in crisis or need immediate support: Call or text 988 (Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, available 24/7). Text HOME to 741741 (Crisis Text Line). For medical emergencies, call 911.

 

Contents

  • What Are Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs)?
  • The ACE Study: What Research Found
  • How ACEs Affect the Developing Brain
  • ACEs and Long-Term Mental Health
  • ACEs and Physical Health
  • Protective Factors and Resilience
  • Healing from ACEs: What Treatment Can Offer
  • Frequently Asked Questions

Adverse childhood experiences – commonly referred to by the acronym ACEs – are potentially traumatic events that occur during childhood and have been shown to have profound, lasting effects on brain development, mental health, physical health, and life outcomes. The term comes from one of the largest and most influential studies in public health history: the ACE Study, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Kaiser Permanente in the 1990s. Understanding adverse childhood experiences is not about assigning blame or pathologizing the past. It is about making sense of why some adults carry burdens that began long before they had any choice in the matter – and about opening the door to the healing that is genuinely possible with the right support.

What Are Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs)?

The original ACE Study defined ten categories of adverse childhood experiences, grouped into three domains:

Abuse

  • Physical abuse – being hit, beaten, kicked, or physically harmed by an adult in the household
  • Emotional abuse – being repeatedly sworn at, humiliated, threatened, or made to feel that one was unloved or worthless
  • Sexual abuse – contact sexual abuse by anyone at least five years older, or any adult

Household Dysfunction

  • Household substance use – living with someone who had a problem with alcohol or other substances
  • Household mental illness – living with someone who was depressed, had a mental illness, or died by suicide
  • Domestic violence – witnessing a mother being abused
  • Parental separation or divorce
  • Incarcerated household member – living with someone who went to prison

Neglect

  • Emotional neglect – not feeling loved, important, or special; feeling that family didn’t look out for each other
  • Physical neglect – not having enough to eat, wearing dirty clothes, having no one to protect you

Subsequent research has expanded the ACEs framework beyond the original ten categories to include community-level adversities such as poverty, racism, neighborhood violence, food insecurity, and the experience of discrimination – recognizing that the original ACE Study, conducted in a predominantly white, middle-class, college-educated sample, captured only a portion of the adverse experiences that shape child development. These expanded ACEs are sometimes called “community ACEs” or “big-T and small-T” trauma in clinical contexts.

The ACE Study: What Research Found

The original ACE Study enrolled over 17,000 adults in the Kaiser Permanente health system in San Diego and asked them to report on childhood adversities and current health status. The findings were striking – and have since been replicated in dozens of studies worldwide.

More than 60% of adults in the study reported at least one ACE. Nearly 25% reported three or more. ACEs were not rare – they were common, cutting across demographics, and their effects were dose-dependent: more ACEs were associated with substantially higher rates of health and mental health problems across the lifespan.

The study found graded, dose-response relationships between ACE scores and a wide range of adult outcomes – including depression, anxiety, substance use disorders, suicide attempts, heart disease, cancer, liver disease, and early mortality. The more adverse childhood experiences a person had, the higher their statistical risk across virtually every health outcome examined. This was not because ACEs caused disease directly in every case, but because they shaped the biological, psychological, and behavioral pathways through which health is built or eroded over time.

The ACE Study’s findings transformed how researchers and clinicians think about the roots of adult health. Rather than asking “What is wrong with this person?” the ACEs framework asks “What happened to this person?” – a shift that is both scientifically important and humanely significant.

How ACEs Affect the Developing Brain

Childhood is a period of extraordinary neurological development. The brain’s architecture – its stress-response systems, attachment circuitry, emotional regulation networks, and cognitive scaffolding – is shaped profoundly by early experience. When those early experiences include chronic fear, neglect, abuse, or household instability, the developing brain adapts to survive those conditions. These adaptations are intelligent and functional in the short term; they can become sources of difficulty later in life.

Toxic Stress and the HPA Axis

The human stress-response system – centered on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis – is designed to activate in response to threat and return to baseline when the threat has passed. In children experiencing ACEs, stress is often chronic, unpredictable, and unmitigated by the buffering presence of a safe, responsive adult. This produces what researchers call “toxic stress” – prolonged activation of stress-response systems in the absence of adequate adult support.

Chronic toxic stress in childhood sensitizes the HPA axis, producing lasting changes in the set-point for stress reactivity. Adults with high ACE scores often show elevated baseline cortisol, exaggerated stress responses to mild triggers, and difficulty returning to calm after activation – the neurobiological legacy of a childhood nervous system calibrated for chronic threat.

Amygdala, Hippocampus, and Prefrontal Cortex

Research consistently documents structural and functional brain changes associated with childhood adversity in three key regions:

  • Amygdala – the brain’s threat-detection center – shows increased volume and reactivity in individuals with high ACE scores, contributing to heightened fear responses and hypervigilance
  • Hippocampus – critical for memory contextualization, learning, and stress regulation – shows reduced volume associated with chronic early stress, contributing to difficulties with memory, learning, and emotional regulation
  • Prefrontal cortex – the region governing impulse control, emotional regulation, planning, and executive function – develops more slowly and shows reduced connectivity in individuals who experienced significant early adversity

These changes are not destiny. The brain retains neuroplastic capacity throughout life – the capacity to change, reorganize, and heal in response to new experiences, including effective treatment. But they do help explain why the effects of ACEs often persist into adulthood without specific, trauma-informed intervention.

ACEs and Long-Term Mental Health

The relationship between ACEs and adult mental health is among the most consistently documented findings in psychiatric epidemiology. High ACE scores are associated with substantially elevated risk for:

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD – particularly when ACEs involve abuse, neglect, or chronic household dysfunction
  • Major depressive disorder – ACEs are among the most robust predictors of depression onset across the lifespan
  • Anxiety disorders – generalized anxiety, social anxiety, panic disorder, and specific phobias are all more prevalent in adults with high ACE scores
  • Substance use disorders – the self-medication hypothesis is well supported by ACE data; many individuals with SUDs are managing the psychological consequences of unaddressed childhood trauma
  • Eating disorders – ACEs, particularly emotional abuse and neglect, are strongly associated with all eating disorder diagnoses
  • Borderline personality disorder – childhood trauma and neglect are among the most consistent findings in the developmental history of BPD
  • Suicidality – ACE scores are strongly associated with lifetime suicide attempts, with risk increasing significantly at higher ACE scores

Understanding ACEs does not reduce these conditions to a simple cause-and-effect narrative. Genetics, later life events, social support, and individual resilience factors all matter. But ACEs provide an essential piece of the clinical picture that is often missing when mental health conditions are treated without attention to developmental history.

ACEs and Physical Health

One of the most striking findings of the original ACE Study was the strength of the relationship between childhood adversity and adult physical health outcomes. ACEs are associated with elevated risk for:

  • Cardiovascular disease and heart attack
  • Stroke
  • Diabetes
  • Cancer
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Autoimmune conditions
  • Chronic pain
  • Obesity
  • Early mortality

The mechanisms are multiple: chronic early stress produces lasting changes in immune function, inflammatory signaling, cardiovascular reactivity, and metabolic regulation. Additionally, the coping behaviors that often develop in response to untreated ACE-related psychological distress – substance use, smoking, disordered eating, physical inactivity – are themselves risk factors for many of the same physical health outcomes. The body keeps the score of what happened in childhood, in ways that manifest decades later.

Protective Factors and Resilience

The ACEs framework is sometimes misread as deterministic – as if a high ACE score makes poor health outcomes inevitable. The research does not support this reading. Many individuals with high ACE scores do not develop the associated health problems, and understanding why is as important as understanding the risk.

The most consistently identified protective factor is the presence of at least one stable, safe, responsive adult relationship during childhood – a caregiver, teacher, relative, or other figure who provides consistent emotional support and acts as a buffer against toxic stress. This single factor is among the most powerful moderators of ACE-related risk identified in the literature.

Additional protective factors include:

  • Strong social connections and community belonging
  • Access to mental health care and trauma-informed treatment
  • Stable, safe housing and economic security
  • School environments that provide consistency and support
  • Individual factors: self-regulation capacity, meaning-making, and the ability to seek and use support

Resilience is not a fixed personality trait some people have and others don’t. It is a dynamic capacity that can be built – through relationships, through treatment, through community – at any point in the lifespan.

Healing from ACEs: What Treatment Can Offer

Adults with high ACE scores can and do heal. The neuroplasticity of the brain means that the adaptations made in response to early adversity can be modified by new experiences – and effective treatment provides those experiences in structured, evidence-based ways.

Trauma-informed care is the foundation of effective ACE-related treatment – an approach that recognizes the pervasive impact of trauma, integrates knowledge about trauma into all aspects of clinical care, and avoids re-traumatization. Within a trauma-informed framework, several specific modalities have strong evidence:

The trauma recovery program at Synchrony Brain Health provides integrated, neuroscience-informed care specifically designed for individuals navigating the long-term effects of childhood trauma and adverse experiences. EMDR therapy – Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing – has one of the strongest evidence bases of any treatment for trauma-related conditions, including those with roots in early childhood adversity. Neurofeedback therapy supports nervous system regulation by directly training the brain’s electrical activity patterns, addressing the hyperarousal and dysregulation that often characterize the neurobiological legacy of ACEs.

Treatment does not erase what happened. But it can change how the past lives in the present – reducing the intensity of trauma symptoms, building regulatory capacity, restoring the ability to feel safe in relationships, and creating the conditions for a meaningful, connected life.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an ACE score and what does it mean?
An ACE score is a simple count of how many of the ten original adverse childhood experience categories a person experienced before age 18. Scores range from 0 to 10. Research shows a dose-response relationship: higher ACE scores are associated with greater risk across mental and physical health outcomes. However, an ACE score is not a diagnosis or a destiny – it is a tool for understanding developmental history and risk context. Many people with high ACE scores lead healthy, fulfilling lives, particularly with access to adequate support and treatment.

Can ACEs affect you if you don’t remember them?
Yes. Many ACEs – particularly those involving early neglect, household dysfunction, or preverbal trauma – may not be consciously remembered in detail, yet still shape the nervous system’s baseline functioning, attachment patterns, and stress reactivity. The body and nervous system encode experience even when explicit memory does not retain it. This is one reason why trauma-informed treatment addresses physiological and somatic dimensions of experience, not only narrative memory.

Is it too late to heal from ACEs as an adult?
No. The brain retains neuroplastic capacity throughout life – the ability to change, reorganize, and build new patterns in response to new experiences. Adults with high ACE scores can make meaningful progress in therapy, build regulatory capacity, improve relationships, and reduce the physical and psychological burden of early adversity. Healing is not instantaneous or linear, but it is possible at any age and at any point in life.

How do ACEs affect parenting?
Unaddressed ACEs can affect parenting by contributing to difficulties with emotional regulation, attachment security, sensitivity to stress, and the capacity to provide the consistent, responsive caregiving that buffers children from their own adversities. This is not a moral failing – it is a predictable consequence of carrying unresolved trauma into the demands of parenthood. Treatment that addresses a parent’s own ACE history is also an investment in the next generation’s wellbeing. Parenting programs informed by attachment theory and trauma have demonstrated effectiveness in interrupting intergenerational transmission of adversity.

Adverse childhood experiences leave real marks – in the nervous system, in patterns of relating, in the body. But they are not the final word. The clinicians at Synchrony Brain Health in Chicago offer trauma-informed, neuroscience-grounded treatment for adults navigating the long-term effects of childhood adversity. Healing is not about erasing the past – it is about reclaiming your present. A consultation is the first step.

Citations: Felitti, V.J., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). cdc.gov. Shonkoff, J.P., et al. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129(1), e232–e246. McLaughlin, K.A., et al. (2014). Childhood adversity and adult psychiatric disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication II: Associations with persistence of DSM-IV disorders. Psychological Medicine, 42(5), 1–13. van der Kolk, B.A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking. Masten, A.S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238.